OUTLINES OF DESIRED GOALS Sometimes it is helpful to learn from others what they did in similar cases as the one before us; What should we strive for in our work with smallholders? Hundreds and even thousands of years ago, spiritual leaders were grappling with rules to guide us on how to treat and relate to others. Could ancient rules that are good for everybody guide us on how to treat and relate to smallholders? The three ancient rules: (1) The Positive approach: "Love thy neighbor as thyself." (Leviticus, chapter 19, verse 18.) (2) The Negative approach: “What is hateful to you, do not do to your friend." (Babylon, Tract Shabbat. Jewish tradition) (3) The Neutral approach: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” (USA Declaration of Independence) Could there be a more significant difference between the answers our ancient fathers gave to those provided by nowadays scholars? Our fathers’ rules are not scientific, academic, professional, numerical, or bound by law. Instead, they aim at people’s self-values, judgment, and hearts, expecting the individual to understand and then decide how to act out of self-motivation without an external force forcing them. The underlying message of our fathers is, “We are all people; others are not different from you. Whatever is good for you is good for others, and if it is not good for you, it is probably not good for the others.” Sections 1-2 ask us to search within ourselves for answers. However, section 3 is the most demanding and difficult to follow; it expects us to accept that others have the right to Happiness. For this, we need to understand what Happiness is for them so we will not hold them from pursuing Happiness. For each of us, Happiness is different. How do smallholders view Happiness? How could we know? There is a way to know what Happiness is for smallholders, and that is by using an old technique called – Talking, in other words, having a personal conversation. SMALLHOLDERS Let’s be truthful for a moment and use our ancient fathers’ way, i.e., sections 1-3, to measure ourselves on how well we treat smallholders; (1) Do we love them as we love ourselves and wish them the same, i.e., Wish B, as we wish for ourselves? Or do we, deep inside, feel okay with smallholders “living a simple life,” as Wish A presents? (2) Are we careful not to do to smallholders what we wish others not to do to us? (3) Do we care about smallholders’ Happiness? Do we even bother asking them what they want and what Happiness is for them? Did you answer with a big YES to all three questions, maybe two or even one YES? Or was it none, a round zero? My personal experience with smallholders is that we, the global society, particularly the leadership, fall short on sections 1 to 3. What score of performance and success will you give our leadership and yourself on sections 1 to 3? (I know, it is the hardest thing to rate yourself). THE MORAL COMPASS WITHIN YOU Nowadays, many believe that we can fix everything through stringent regulation. While our ancient fathers’ system of dealing with “the others” is left outside the fence of law, the “big bad wolves” always find loopholes in the fence, entering the hen house and feasting on the chickens. For the big agro companies, often the laws are the way to show how good and contributing they are, acting as farmers' protectors' "saints." Hey, they even made the legislature enact laws that fit their business needs. In the old times, there were also laws, as we have today. Our ancestors knew that too often, the law is the villain's refuge, so they asked us to be our own judges. This way, if we act wrongly, we quickly know who the villain is. The USA Declaration of Independence takes this a step forward when stating that the people should replace their leaders if those do not keep their “unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Did you notice that each of my columns ends with this statement, “Mental and Economic Freedom Are Interconnected?” That is to emphasize that you can’t live in poverty, e.g., on less than 1.9 $/day, and experience "Freedom" fully. Hence, economic prosperity is not a luxury; it is what we wish for ourselves, a condition for freedom, and ultimately an "unalienable Right.” If so, why don’t we wish economic prosperity to all, including smallholders? Who is responsible for not achieving that prosperity until now? And on top of all, what can we do to change smallholders’ situation from A to B? |